?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 
 
18 June 2009 @ 12:04 pm
Nomination  
*** EDIT: corrected some double entries of text and reformatted into cleaner paragraphs

I invite you to take a look through my archive as well as this introductory post.

LiveJournal has been here for ten years and some of its users nearly that long. What LJ does well has never been duplicated -- it's community driven, it's content driven. It's users are content producers. LJ is unique in social networking sites in that it has become a valuable repository for people's memories -- it truly has taken the place of a paper journal and many people have forsaken their handwritten diaries for an LJ which has many additional benefits but one serious drawback -- the threat of impermanence. While many people probably wouldn't consider trying to archive their Facebook status updates, many of us look to our LiveJournal's as an official personal history -- a document that needs to be preserved for future reference and grows in value each day.

The reason that I'm running for this position is that I feel there are gaping flaws in LiveJournal's ability to be able to continue to shoulder these responsibilities.

1) LiveJournal needs a server side backup and restore feature, which includes comments. In the past year I've seen too many people's accounts deleted and replaced with advertisements -- and was shocked to discover that LiveJournal has no method to restore these. Years of people's lives lost.

2) LiveJournal also needs a global search and replace mechanism. Over the years as users move from image-host to image-host (perhaps from someplace like tripod.com to a place like Photobucket, and maybe to their own web server) their images need to stay. Currently, if you switch image hosts the user needs to manually update every entry.

In addition to those are a number of smaller things: It should be easier to look through back entries rather than having to page day by day. The spell-check should be integrated, LJ should investigate a new "read this user" feature to distinguish between actual friends whom you want to share you secrets with, and people who's journals you simply want to read.


LJ asks that I answer the following questions:

What do you think is the value of LiveJournal?
The thing that sets LiveJournal apart from other social networking sites is that it is community based and driven by content producers. It is a place for creative people to write, to produce, to share, reveal secrets, or keep them. The things that are good about LJ have not been duplicated by any other social networking site. It is a precious place which occupies a large place in my heart and I want, desperately, for it to continue.


What changes would you like to see LiveJournal make in the next year?

1) The biggest change the LiveJournal needs to make is in recognizing that its users have spent hundreds or thousands of hours creating their presence here. Recently we've seen a wave of attacks by malicious individuals or groups who delete peoples accounts and replace them with links to malware websites. In the grand scheme of things, this is probably to be expected. But it is inconceivable that LiveJournal has no way to restore deleted accounts. This boggles my mind. What it says to users is "don't trust us with your work." There needs to be a mechanism for backing up and restoring LJ accounts. LiveJournal needs to realize that they are a mechanism for people's memories.

2) Users need to be able to search and replace their old entries.

3) Reading back entries should be easier -- LJ will let you go "back X entries" for a while but eventually defaults to "previous day".


Why do you want to be the elected representative?
It is with great reluctance that I do this. I have plenty of other things I can be spending my time on, but I fear that if I don't do this, it won't get done. This is in large part for selfish reasons because I want to know that in fifty years the work that I've put into this community every day will be somewhere, that it will be readable, viewable, that it won't simply evaporate.


What do you think are the community’s greatest concerns?
Impermanence. Users want to know that LiveJournal will be here in the next ten years. LiveJournal also needs to figure out how to exist in a world with Facebook, twitter, and the other places which have come to glue the Internet community together. Growing the paid user base is important to this primary goal.


What skills, qualifications, or unique perspective do you think you would bring to this position?
I've been a member of LiveJournal since 2002, I've built up a community of friends here, people I care about and people I wouldn't have met otherwise. I understand the dynamics of groups of large people with differing opinions. As the moderator of photographers, a community with more than ten thousand members I've been able to maintain a space which is exciting, informative, welcoming and nearly drama-free under the single guiding principle "be nice". I think that goes a long way. In all this time on LJ I've never treated another user with disrespect.






Thanks.
 
 
 
sidewinder: barking madsidewinder on June 18th, 2009 04:14 pm (UTC)
I approve this nomination!

(Pssst: I think you're supposed to adjust your settings to screen all comments on this entry, so that only approval comments are shown publicly for the official count.)

Edited at 2009-06-18 04:15 pm (UTC)
Rocketsubpolka on June 18th, 2009 04:18 pm (UTC)
I absolutely support this nomination.
Cleopatra Goblinscattereddark on June 18th, 2009 04:18 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination.
laurelhartlaurelhart on June 18th, 2009 04:19 pm (UTC)
here here!
Tiffany Marvelousdominamia on June 18th, 2009 04:19 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination.
guedo79 on June 18th, 2009 04:22 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination
Nathaliespacedlaw on June 18th, 2009 04:23 pm (UTC)
I approve!
Contra Regulationbiotheory on June 18th, 2009 04:24 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination.
Lady Celialadycelia on June 18th, 2009 04:24 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination.
Katherine Rosescarletdulcinea on June 18th, 2009 04:24 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination.
shuttergalshuttergal on June 18th, 2009 04:24 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination
Elena Gleason: HHGG hoopy froodmidnightsmagic on June 18th, 2009 04:24 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination.
Ednoriaednoria on June 18th, 2009 04:25 pm (UTC)
I totally approve this nomination. Totally.
Faerlanfaerlan on June 18th, 2009 04:25 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination.
FORSTUVNINGsigrdrifa on June 18th, 2009 04:25 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination.
Anna Lyticalannalytical on June 18th, 2009 04:25 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination.
Jaredplanetx on June 18th, 2009 04:25 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination
nepenthes59nepenthes59 on June 18th, 2009 04:25 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination
Wolf That Knowsmorlith on June 18th, 2009 04:26 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination.
sweet_far_thingsweet_far_thing on June 18th, 2009 04:26 pm (UTC)
i support this nomination.
Names Is For Tombstones, Babyyagathai on June 18th, 2009 04:26 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination.
fiascofarmfiascofarm on June 18th, 2009 04:26 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination!
coppervalecoppervale on June 18th, 2009 04:26 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination.
buckskin and lacehennepin on June 18th, 2009 04:27 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination!
mujetdeboismujetdebois on June 18th, 2009 04:27 pm (UTC)
I support this nomination!!